Legal Opinion

Kildea v. Electro Wire Products, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 15, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-CV-40126-FLPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEWBLATT, District Judge.

Before the Court are cross motions for partial summary judgment. Defendant’s motion is DENIED, and plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

This action arises under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (“the Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq. (1988). For our purposes, the Act basically provides that employers of a certain size must give affected employees 60 days’ notice of a mass layoff or plant closing.

Plaintiffs consist of two overlapping classes of former employees: those who were allegedly laid off in a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. Kayser-Roth Hosiery, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1990
  2. Damron v. Rob Fork Mining Corp.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1990
  3. Jones v. Kayser-Roth Hosiery, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1990
  4. Solberg v. Inline Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rifkin v. Mcdonnell Douglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  2. Automobile Mechanics' Local No. 701 of the International Ass'n v. Santa Fe Terminal Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  3. Martin v. AMR Services Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  4. Halkias v. General Dynamics Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1993
  5. Kildea v. Electro Wire Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API