Legal Opinion
Jones v. Kayser-Roth Hosiery, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided July 18, 1990No. Civ. 3-89-545PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBERT P. MURRIAN, United States Magistrate.
This case is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Rule 73(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for all further proceedings, including entry of judgment [Doc. 4].
This is a class action brought pursuant to the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (“WARN”), 29 U.S.C. § 2101, et seq. The class is comprised of all former employees at the Harriman facility of Kay-ser-Roth Hosiery, Inc. (“KR”), who are “affected employees” within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. § 2101(a)(5), and who sustained an “employment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fariss v. Lynchburg FoundryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Hamby v. Genesco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
- MacDougal v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1985
- Damron v. Rob Fork Mining Corp.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Loehrer v. Mcdonnell Douglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Local Union 7107, United Mine Workers of America, District 28 v. Clinchfield Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Jurcev v. Central Community HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Wallace v. Detroit Coke Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
- Barnett v. Jamesway Corp. (In Re Jamesway Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.