Legal Opinion

Damron v. Rob Fork Mining Corp.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided June 6, 1990No. 6:03-misc-00010PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HOOD, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, former employees of defendant Mine 29 Mining and Processing, Inc. [Mine 29], filed this action claiming that Mine 29, in association with defendants Rob Fork Mining Corporation and Rob Fork Processing Corporation [Rob Fork], Jackal Mining Company [Jackal], Sidewinder Mining Company [Sidewinder], and BethEnergy Mines, Inc. 1 , failed to give sixty days notification of the closing of Mine 29’s operations as required under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq. [WARN Act]. Defendants Rob…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kustom Electronics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jones v. Kayser-Roth Hosiery, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1990
  2. Halkias v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Jones v. Kayser-Roth Hosiery, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1990
  4. Martin v. AMR Services Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  5. Local 217 Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union v. MHM, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API