Damron v. Rob Fork Mining Corp.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HOOD, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, former employees of defendant Mine 29 Mining and Processing, Inc. [Mine 29], filed this action claiming that Mine 29, in association with defendants Rob Fork Mining Corporation and Rob Fork Processing Corporation [Rob Fork], Jackal Mining Company [Jackal], Sidewinder Mining Company [Sidewinder], and BethEnergy Mines, Inc. 1 , failed to give sixty days notification of the closing of Mine 29’s operations as required under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq. [WARN Act]. Defendants Rob…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kustom Electronics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jones v. Kayser-Roth Hosiery, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1990
- Halkias v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Jones v. Kayser-Roth Hosiery, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1990
- Martin v. AMR Services Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Local 217 Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union v. MHM, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.