Legal Opinion

Kildea v. Electro Wire Products, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 13, 1992No. 4:90-cv-40126PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEWBLATT, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendant’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment, and plaintiffs’ response. A hearing on defendant’s motion was held on May 11, 1992. The Court notes that defendant’s motion was filed long past the expiration of the cut-off date set for the filing of dispositive motions in this case. Although plaintiffs request for the Court to deny defendant’s motion on this basis, the Court prefers to rule on the merits. 1 For the following reasons, defendant’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.

This action arises out of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Damron v. Rob Fork Mining Corp.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1990
  2. Damron v. Rob Fork Mining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. Kildea v. Electro Wire Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Sequoyah Fuels Corp.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1994
  2. United Mine Workers of America International Union v. Martinka Coal Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1999
  3. Butler v. Giant Markets, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API