Wilder v. Hobson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motions for summary judgment since a genuine issue of material fact exists whether “Safety Taxi” constitutes a partnership or a joint venture. Plaintiff contends that even if defendants are not engaged in a classic partnership, a question of fact exists whether defendants held themselves out to the public to be a partnership by filing a certificate of assumed name pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 66-68 and displaying the “Safety Taxi” sign and telephone number on their taxis. Defendants contend that summary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Johnson Ex Rel. Dickson v. GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Land-Of-Sky Regional Council v. County of HendersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Rolling Fashion Mart, Inc. v. MainorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Zickgraf Hardwood Co. v. SeayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Southex Exhibitions, Inc. v. Rhode Island Builders Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Best Cartage, Inc. v. Stonewall Packaging, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Dealers Supply Co., Inc. v. Cheil Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- LSB Financial Services, Inc. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Smith v. ReddMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.