Legal Opinion

Wilder v. Hobson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 1990No. 9019SC356PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motions for summary judgment since a genuine issue of material fact exists whether “Safety Taxi” constitutes a partnership or a joint venture. Plaintiff contends that even if defendants are not engaged in a classic partnership, a question of fact exists whether defendants held themselves out to the public to be a partnership by filing a certificate of assumed name pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 66-68 and displaying the “Safety Taxi” sign and telephone number on their taxis. Defendants contend that summary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Johnson Ex Rel. Dickson v. GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Land-Of-Sky Regional Council v. County of HendersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Rolling Fashion Mart, Inc. v. MainorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Zickgraf Hardwood Co. v. SeayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Southex Exhibitions, Inc. v. Rhode Island Builders Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. Best Cartage, Inc. v. Stonewall Packaging, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Dealers Supply Co., Inc. v. Cheil Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  4. LSB Financial Services, Inc. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Smith v. ReddMississippi Supreme Court · 1991

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API