Land-Of-Sky Regional Council v. County of Henderson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
The privotal question we must address is whether plaintiff was entitled to a summary judgment as a matter of law. We conclude that as a matter of law plaintiff was entitled to a summary judgment.
A purpose of G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56, motion for summary judgment is to avoid useless trials when a debtor has chosen to defend rather than default. See Pridgen v. Hughes, 9 N.C. App. 635, 177 S.E. 2d 425 (1970). In pertinent part, G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c) provides:
The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Godley v. County of PittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Pridgen v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Henderson v. . Gill, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Wachovia Mortgage Co. v. Autry-Barker-Spurrier Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Wachovia Mortgage Co. v. Autry-Barker-Spurrier Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wilder v. HobsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Denson v. Richmond CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Busby v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Summey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. County of HendersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- County of Wake v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.