Zickgraf Hardwood Co. v. Seay
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
This is an appeal from a jury verdict for plaintiff on an account stated. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court should have granted the defendant wife’s motions for directed verdict because she was not a partner in the business and was not otherwise liable on the account. For the reasons stated below, we conclude that a directed verdict in favor of Jimmie Seay should have been entered and the case against her dismissed.
It is well settled that a motion for directed verdict under Rule 50 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure may be granted only if the evidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arnold v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Norburn v. MacKieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- GENERAL AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY v. DouglassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Nello L. Teer Company v. Dickerson, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Johnson Ex Rel. Dickson v. GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Compton v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Wilder v. HobsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Best Cartage, Inc. v. Stonewall Packaging, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Dealers Supply Co., Inc. v. Cheil Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Anderson v. Brokers, Inc. (In Re Brokers, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.