Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Nicastro

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 16, 1980No. 80 C 2820PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Eileen Kennedy and Frank Murphy 1 filed this action as a claimed class action on behalf of the stockholders of Xcor International, Inc. (“Xcor ) 2 and as a claimed derivative action on behalf of Xcor. 3 Defendants include Xcor, Seeburg, 4 Consolidated Entertainment, Inc., 5 Xcor’s officers, directors, attorneys and accountants and principal lender, and another alleged controlling person of Xcor, Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.

Various of the defendants have filed motions to dismiss the Amended Complaint, incorporating by reference…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bernard A. Schlifke and Harvey Kallick, D/B/A K & S Investments Co., a Partnership v. Seafirst Corp. And Seattle-First National BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. Beck v. Cantor, Fitzgerald & Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  3. Hagert v. Glickman, Lurie, Eiger & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
  4. Coronet Insurance v. SeyfarthDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
  5. In Re VMS Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API