Legal Opinion
Beck v. Cantor, Fitzgerald & Co., Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 19, 1985No. 84 C 10557PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROVNER, District Judge.
Presently pending before this Court are the various motions of the defendants, Xonics, Inc. (“Xonics”) and the individual Xonics defendants, Cantor, Fitzgerald & Co., Inc. (“Cantor, Fitzgerald”) and Larry Friend, and Laventhol & Horwath (“Laventhol”), to dismiss plaintiff Richard Beck’s First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), for failure to plead fraud with particularity, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b), and for lack of pendent jurisdiction if the federal claims…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Mirkin v. WassermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Craighead v. E.F. Hutton & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Bernard A. Schlifke and Harvey Kallick, D/B/A K & S Investments Co., a Partnership v. Seafirst Corp. And Seattle-First National BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.