Legal Opinion

Farmer v. Farmer

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2010No. S-13330PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A probate master appointed a temporary limited conservator for Robert Farmer. The conservatorship was reviewed the following year; the probate master held a hearing, found that Robert was incapacitated to the extent he was unable to effectively manage his financial affairs, and recommended that his daughter be appointed partial limited conservator. The superior court considered the matter de novo and ultimately adopted the probate master’s findings and recommendations. Robert appeals, arguing: (1) the evidence does not support the need for appointment of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. S.N.E. v. R.L.B.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Peterson v. EkAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Demoski v. NewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Casey v. Semco Energy, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Dodson v. DodsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Day v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Jude M. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. In re the Protective Proceedings of M.K.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Wilson v. State, Department of LawAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. ITMO Protective Proceeding of S.J.Alaska Supreme Court · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API