Legal Opinion

Day v. Williams

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 2012No. Nos. S-13423, S-13433PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOWERS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this appeal we review the superior court's valuation and distribution of marital property in the divorce of Carolyn Vieve Day and Charlie T. Williams. Day appeals on three grounds: first, she contends that the superior court erred when it found her to be employable; second, she argues that the facts and equities of this case do not support a 50-50 property division; and third, she argues that the superior court should not have included in the marital estate funds that had already been spent by the date of trial. We remand for additional findings on…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ogard v. OgardAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Lone Wolf v. Lone WolfAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Schmitz v. SchmitzAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jerry B. v. Sally B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Dundas v. DundasAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Ruppe v. RuppeAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Hockema v. HockemaAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Laura Aubert, Personal Representative of the Estate of David L. Aubert v. Debra J. Wilson, f/k/a Debra J. AubertAlaska Supreme Court · 2021

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API