Legal Opinion

Knowles v. City of Aiken

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 5, 1991No. 23448PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

This case involves a landowner in Aiken, South Carolina, who seeks judicial invalidation of a zoning ordinance passed by the City of Aiken which she claims constitutes illegal spot zoning. The Master-in-Equity granted summary judgment to the City. We affirm.

The facts are undisputed. The City of Aiken annexed a tract of land near the landowner’s residence and zoned the tract for professional offices. The tract was previously unzoned county property on which were located a beauty shop operated out of a trailer home and an automobile upholstery repair shop surrounded by several…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rush v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. Talbot v. Myrtle Beach Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  3. Bob Jones University, Inc. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  4. Rushing v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  5. Hampton v. Richland CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Restaurant Row Associates v. Horry CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Gurganious v. City of BeaufortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Whaley v. Dorchester County Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Dunes West Golf Club, LLC v. Town of Mount PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  5. Harbit v. City of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API