Legal Opinion

Rushing v. City of Greenville

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 5, 1975No. 20092PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

These three zoning cases have been consolidated for appeal. The Trial Judge, concurring with the Master in Equity, declared as “unreasonable” the City Council of Greenville’s denial of respondents’ application for rezoning. The City seeks reversal of the Trial Judge’s order. The plaintiffs-respondents are the owners of separate adjoining lots on the south side of Augusta Street, at the intersection of Church, in the City of Greenville. Their lots are all zoned in classification “D” which allows multiple family residential uses. They have asked for a rezoning of their respective…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rush v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. Lurey v. City of LaurensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Harbit v. City of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Knowles v. City of AikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Eagle Container Co. Ex Rel. Estate of Spotts v. County of NewberryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Hampton v. Richland CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Bear Enterprises v. County of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API