Legal Opinion
Harbit v. City of Charleston
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided February 25, 2009No. 4511PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GEATHERS, J.:
In this appeal, Jeffrey Harbit (Harbit) argues that the circuit court improperly granted summary judgment in favor of the City of Charleston (the City) on several claims stemming from the City’s refusal to rezone Harbit’s single family residential property for limited commercial use. We affirm.
FACTS
Harbit is the owner of property located at 7 Wesley Drive, which is within the City’s limits. The property is on the corner of Wesley Drive and Stocker Drive. The house at 7 Wesley Drive faces Wesley Drive with a rear entrance and driveway accessible only from Stocker Drive. Wesley…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sylvia Development Corporation v. Calvert CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Law v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- George v. FabriSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- David v. McLeod Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Town of Hollywood v. FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Dunes West Golf Club, LLC v. Town of Mount PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- South Carolina Ambulatory Surgery Center Ass'n v. South Carolina Workers' Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Spur at Williams Brice Owners Ass'n v. LallaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
- McMaster v. COLUMBIA BD. OF ZONING APPEALSSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.