Legal Opinion
Roman v. Ashcroft
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided January 4, 2002No. 1:01CV1236PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On September 6, 2001, this Court granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss for want of personal jurisdiction and denied the motion to dismiss for improper venue. The Court ordered the respondents to show cause, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2248, why the writ should not be granted. For the.foregoing reasons, the Court now grants the writ of habeas corpus.
BACKGROUND
The petitioner, Julio Roman, is a national of the Dominican Republic. His status was adjusted to that of a lawful permanent…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fiallo Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Julio E. Roman v. John AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Sylwia Jankowski-Burczyk v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Marco Garcia-Echaverria v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Garcia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Julio E. Roman v. John AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004