Legal Opinion
Julio E. Roman v. John Ashcroft
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 14, 2004No. 02-3253Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
340 F.3d 314
Julio E. ROMAN, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
John ASHCROFT et al., Respondents-Appellants.
No. 02-3253.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Argued: June 10, 2003.
Decided and Filed: August 13, 2003.
Petition for Rehearing Denied En Banc: January 14, 2004. Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206
ARGUED: Alison R. Drucker, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, CIVIL DIVISION, Washington, D.C., for Appellants.
David W. Leopold (argued and briefed), David Wolfe Leopold & Associates, Cleveland, Ohio, for Petitioner-Appellee.
ON BRIEF: Alison R. Drucker, UNITED STATES…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Moore; Concurrence.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Franklin Henderson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Saul Navas v. Janet Reno, as Attorney General of the United States, Engin Yesil v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Doris Meissner, Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service Immigration and Naturalization Service John B.Z. Caplinger, District Director Nancy Hooks, Officer in Charge, Guillermo Mojica v. Janet Reno, as Attorney General of the United States, Saul Navas v. Janet Reno, as Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.