Fiallo Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. Bell
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell
This case brings before us a constitutional challenge to §§ 101 (b) (1) (D) and 101 (b) (2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (Act), 66 Stat. 182, as amended, 8 U. S. C. §§ 1101 (b) (1) (D) and 1101 (b) (2).
I
The Act grants special preference immigration status to aliens who qualify as the “children” or “parents” of United States citizens or lawful permanent residents. Under § 101 (b) (1), a “child” is defined as an unmarried person under 21 years of age who is a legitimate or legitimated child, a stepchild, an adopted child, or an illegitimate child seeking preference by virtue…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. MezeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Kleindienst v. MandelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by764 opinions
- Demore v. KimSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Landon v. PlasenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Trump v. HawaiiSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Saidou Dia v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
759 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.