Legal Opinion

Fiallo Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. Bell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 26, 1977No. 75-6297PublishedCited by 764 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell

This case brings before us a constitutional challenge to §§ 101 (b) (1) (D) and 101 (b) (2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (Act), 66 Stat. 182, as amended, 8 U. S. C. §§ 1101 (b) (1) (D) and 1101 (b) (2).

I

The Act grants special preference immigration status to aliens who qualify as the “children” or “parents” of United States citizens or lawful permanent residents. Under § 101 (b) (1), a “child” is defined as an unmarried person under 21 years of age who is a legitimate or legitimated child, a stepchild, an adopted child, or an illegitimate child seeking preference by virtue…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. MezeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Kleindienst v. MandelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by764 opinions

  1. Demore v. KimSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Landon v. PlasenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Trump v. HawaiiSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. Saidou Dia v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003

759 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API