Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Diaz

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 1, 1976No. 73-1046PublishedCited by 1,243 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

The question presented by the Secretary’s appeal is whether Congress may condition an alien’s eligibility for participation in a federal medical insurance program on continuous residence in the United States for a five-year period and admission for permanent residence. The District Court held that the first condition was unconstitutional and that it could not be severed from the second. Since we conclude that both conditions are constitutional, we reverse.

Each of the appellees is a resident alien who was lawfully admitted to the United States less than five years ago. Appellees Diaz and Clara…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,243 opinions

  1. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Demore v. KimSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

1,238 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API