Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Sherman
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 20, 1984No. Civ. 64878PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, P. J.
The matter herein consists of two appeals taken by Eugene N. Sherman (Husband), the first from an order denying relief under Husband’s order to show cause for termination of his obligation to pay spousal support to Charlotte P. Sherman (Wife) on account of her remarriage, and the second from a subsequent order awarding Wife attorney’s fees in the amount of $5,000, which second order was made after the filing of Husband’s first appeal.
The following further facts more specifically delineate the framework from which is drawn our conclusion that each of the orders should be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Melnyk v. RobledoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Hilton v. McNittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Hennessy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- In Re Marriage of NicolaidesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- In Re Marriage of CuevaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bankes v. LucasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Nazemi v. TsengCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Hoover Community Hotel Development Corp. v. ThomsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- In Re Marriage of BenjaminsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- In Re Marriage of PaulCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.