Legal Opinion

Nazemi v. Tseng

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1992No. B058955PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HINZ, J.

Introduction

Plaintiffs, cross-defendants and appellants Farshad Nazemi and Mahmood R. Sariaslani (plaintiffs) appeal the trial court’s award of attorney fees for trial and for appeal in favor of defendant, cross-complainant and respondent David Tseng (Tseng).

Plaintiffs contend Tseng’s request for attorney fees was untimely, insufficient evidence supported the award, and the trial court failed to apportion the fees between the contract and noncontract claims.

We reverse the award of attorney fees for trial and affirm the award of attorney fees on appeal.

Background

Plaintiffs sued…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Christensen v. Dewor DevelopmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Grant v. List & LathropCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Abdallah v. United Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Robertson v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Exxess Electronixx v. Heger Realty Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Thompson Pacific Construction Inc. v. City of SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Bankes v. LucasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API