Hilton v. McNitt
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment allowing and establishing a creditor’s claim for $7,500 filed by Ruth M. Hilton against the estate of her deceased husband, Hal H. Hilton, based on a property settlement agreement entered into between them and on an award made in an interlocutory decree of divorce. The executor of the husband’s estate, Rollin L. McNitt and the claimant both appeal. Mrs. Hilton’s appeal is only on the denial of interest on her claim.
The major point involved on this appeal is the effect of the 1951 amendment to section 139 of the Civil Code. The portion of that amendment here…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Estate of BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Estate of GirardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
3Cited by44 opinions
- Estate of BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re Marriage of NicolaidesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- In Re Marriage of IbertiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Palmer v. GreggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Borden v. Division of Medical QualityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.