Legal Opinion

State v. Halstien

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1993No. 59491-1PublishedCited by 255 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Steve Halstien seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision affirming his second degree burglary conviction with a finding of sexual motivation. At issue is whether the juvenile sexual motivation statute is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, and whether the evidence is sufficient to support the court's finding that a motive for the burglary was sexual gratification. We affirm.

I

Halstien, a juvenile, was accused of burglarizing the house of C.B., a female customer on his newspaper route. In addition to charging Halstien with second degree burglary, the prosecutor alleged the crime was…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by255 opinions

  1. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997

250 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API