Legal Opinion

City of Tacoma v. Luvene

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1992No. 57591-6PublishedCited by 142 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

This is an appeal from a criminal conviction for drug loitering. Petitioner John Luvene seeks review of his conviction for drug loitering under Tacoma Municipal Code (TMC) 8.72.010. He challenges the ordinance as being unconstitutionally overbroad and vague, as well as challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to convict him of the crime of drug loitering. Finally, he claims the Tacoma ordinance is unconstitutional as being preempted by RCW 69.50.608. As construed, we find the Tacoma drug loitering ordinance to be both constitutional and not preempted by state law. The conviction is…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by142 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. State v. HalstienWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997

137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API