Legal Opinion

Weaver v. Royal Insurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 17, 1996No. 94-825PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.

The plaintiffs, Samuel and Martha Beth Weaver, individually and as parents and next friends of Johnathan Weaver, appeal the Superior Court’s {Goode, J.) grant of summary judgment to the defendant, Royal Insurance Company of America. They argue that neither the pollution exclusion nor the automobile exclusion in Samuel Weaver’s business liability policy preclude coverage for their claims. We reverse and remand.

The parties agreed to the following facts for purposes of determining coverage. The underlying writ alleges the following: In the summer of 1989, while painting and stripping a house,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Western World Insurance Company v. Stack Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. West American Insurance Co. v. Tufco Flooring East, IncCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  4. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. NoskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. McFaddenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. American States Insurance v. KolomsIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Peace Ex Rel. Lerner v. Northwestern National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Porterfield v. Audubon Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Gainsco Insurance Co. v. Amoco Production Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Bianco Professional Ass'n v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API