Legal Opinion

Hebrew Academy of San Francisco v. Goldman

California Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 2007No. S134873PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

In this case, we address whether the statute of limitations bars a cause of action for defamation that is based upon statements contained in a transcript of an oral history that was published with only limited circulation. We held in Shively v. Bozanich (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1230, 1237 [7 Cal.Rptr.3d 576, 80 P.3d 676], that under the single-publication rule, the statute of limitations on a cause of action for defamation based upon a statement in a book published with general circulation “ran from the date the book was first generally distributed to the public, regardless of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shively v. BozanichCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Manguso v. Oceanside Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. DOMINIAK v. National EnquirerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. McGuiness v. Motor Trend MagazineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Hartmann v. American News Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Charles Yeager v. Connie BowlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Woods v. Prestwick House, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  4. Christoff v. Nestle USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Miller v. Collectors Universe, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API