Legal Opinion
Charles Yeager v. Connie Bowlin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 10, 2012No. 10-15297, 10-16503PublishedCited by 192 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs, retired General Charles E. “Chuck” Yeager and his foundation, appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants Ed and Connie Bowlin. Yeager contends that the district court should not have struck his declaration, which contains comprehensive details he did not remember at his deposition. He also contends that, under California’s single-publication rule, the Bowlins “republished” statements about him on their website — and thereby restarted the statute of limitations — when they modified unrelated information on their website.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Kennedy v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Andrew H.K. Wong v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Van Asdale v. International Game TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by192 opinions
- Kevin Pack v. Middlebury Community SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- John Daubert v. NRA Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- George Kiebala v. Derek BorisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Scottie Pippen v. NBCUniversal Media LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
187 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.