Legal Opinion

Christoff v. Nestle USA, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 2009No. S155242PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J. —

In 1986, professional model Russell Christoff was paid $250 to pose for a photograph to be used in Canada on a label for bricks of coffee. Sixteen years later, Christoff saw his face on a jar of Taster’s Choice instant coffee in the United States and discovered that his image had been used without his consent on millions of labels sold internationally for the preceding five years. Christoff filed the present action for appropriation of his likeness six years after Nestlé USA, Inc. (Nestlé), began using his image on the Taster’s Choice label but less than a year after his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gregoire v. G. P. Putnam's SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Shively v. BozanichCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Blair v. Nevada Landing Partnership, RBG, LPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. Rinaldi v. Viking Penguin, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ashraf v. Adventist Health Sys./Sunbelt, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2018
  2. Charles Yeager v. Connie BowlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Love v. Associated Newspapers, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Scottie Pippen v. NBCUniversal Media LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Roberts v. McAfee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API