Legal Opinion

State v. Walters

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 24, 1978No. 69PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

At the close of all the evidence defendant moved that he be permitted to read to the jury G.S. 14-17 and G.S. 14-18, including the statutory provisions pertaining to punishment for first and second degree murder and manslaughter. This motion was denied “with respect to any reading of the punishment provisions.” Defendant assigned this denial as error, and the Court of Appeals awarded him a new trial on that basis. The State’s appeal challenges the correctness of that decision.

G.S. 84-14 provides, in part: “In jury trials the whole case as well of law as of fact may be argued…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. McMorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. BucknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. DammonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. PeoplesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. United States v. JeffersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API