National Surety Corp. v. Immunex Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
¶1 This court has long recognized that a liability insurer uncertain of its obligation to defend its insured may undertake a “reservation of rights” defense while seeking a declaration regarding coverage. The question in this case is whether the insurer may unilaterally condition its reservation of rights defense on making the insured absorb the defense costs if a court ultimately determines there is no coverage. We answer no. We recognize, however, that an insurer may avoid or minimize its responsibility for defense costs when an insured belatedly tenders a claim and the insurer demonstrates…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Hecla Mining Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- American & Foreign Insurance v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- General Agents Insurance Co. of America, Inc. v. Midwest Sporting Goods Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Expedia, Inc. v. Steadfast InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Veridian Credit Union v. Eddie Bauer, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
- Mass. Bay Ins. Co. v. Walflor Indus., Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- Moody v. Oregon Community Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. SpeedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.