Legal Opinion

National Surety Corp. v. Immunex Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 2013No. 86535-3PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

¶1 This court has long recognized that a liability insurer uncertain of its obligation to defend its insured may undertake a “reservation of rights” defense while seeking a declaration regarding coverage. The question in this case is whether the insurer may unilaterally condition its reservation of rights defense on making the insured absorb the defense costs if a court ultimately determines there is no coverage. We answer no. We recognize, however, that an insurer may avoid or minimize its responsibility for defense costs when an insured belatedly tenders a claim and the insurer demonstrates…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hecla Mining Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. American & Foreign Insurance v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. General Agents Insurance Co. of America, Inc. v. Midwest Sporting Goods Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Expedia, Inc. v. Steadfast InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Veridian Credit Union v. Eddie Bauer, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
  3. Mass. Bay Ins. Co. v. Walflor Indus., Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
  4. Moody v. Oregon Community Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. SpeedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API