Legal Opinion

Trinity Universal Insurance v. Ohio Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 19, 2013No. 67832-9-IPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.

¶1 Trinity defended and settled a personal injury claim made against Ohio’s insured. Trinity then sued Ohio for subrogation, equitable contribution, and insurer bad faith under the CPA1 and IFCA.2 When Ohio failed to appear, Trinity obtained a default order and *191judgment for defense and indemnification costs, as well as treble damages under the CPA and IFCA. Trinity claims that under the principle of equitable subrogation, it was entitled to assert the insured’s CPA and IFCA claims against Ohio, even without express agreement. We reverse the portions of the judgment based on the CPA and IFCA…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Perez-Crisantos v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Arthur West v. Seattle Port CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Langley v. Geico General InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2015
  4. Mutual Of Enumclaw, App./cross-res v. Myong Suk Day, Res/cross-appellantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. McCarthy Finance, Inc. v. PremeraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API