Legal Opinion

Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Norton

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 1913No. 2797PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

This action was brought by an employer and its insurance carrier under Section 21 (b) of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 921(b), to review and set aside, as not in accordance with law, a compensation award made by the Deputy Commissioner. The complaint alleges that there is no competent evidence to support the finding of the Deputy Commissioner that the claimant’s disability was the result of the accident and that compensation should have been suspended by the Deputy Commissioner for the reason that the claimant unreasonably refused…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Independent Pier Co. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
  2. Jarka Corporation of Philadelphia v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Frank Marra Co. v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Wood Preserving Corporation v. McManigalDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
  5. Southern S. S. Co. v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southern Stevedoring Co. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  2. Perini Corporation v. HeydeDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1969
  3. Liberty Mut. Ins. v. MarshallDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1944
  4. Ennis v. O'HearneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API