Jarka Corporation of Philadelphia v. Norton
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
The plaintiff in this bill for injunction complains that the award of the deputy commissioner is not in accordance with law in that it is without any evidence to support it. The case is undoubtedly a close one, but I have carefully examined the testimony taken before the deputy commissioner and I think there is evidence to support the findings.
The claimant was injured on December 8, 1928, by being struck on the back by a falling lump of clay. He was unable to return to work until March 18, 1929, at which time he worked one day, found he was unable to go on, and was…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Southern Stevedoring Co. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- Hampton Roads Stevedoring Corporation v. O'HearneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Smith v. Terminal Transfer CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
- Liberty Stevedoring Co. v. CardilloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1937
- Shrewsbury Retirement Board v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.