Legal Opinion
Southern S. S. Co. v. Norton
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 17, 1941No. 1408PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed his bill for the purpose of reviewing and setting aside an order for the payment of compensation made by Deputy Commissioner Norton, under the •provisions of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq., upon the ground that the order was not in accordance with the law. The bill prays that interlocutory .and permanent injunctions be granted, restraining the Deputy Commissioner from enforcing the award of compensation or from imposing any penalty upon the plaintiff for not complying with the provisions of the award,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hoage v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
- Wheeling Corrugating Co. v. McManigalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Kobilkin v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Liberty Mut. Ins. v. MarshallDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1944
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1913
- Southern S. S. Co. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942