Laney-Payne Farm Loan Co. v. Greenhaw
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). This court has steadily adhered to the rule that the findings of fact made by a chancellor will not be set aside on appeal unless they are clearly against the preponderance of the evidence. Tested by this rule, it cannot be said that the decree of the chancery court is erroneous because the finding of fact made by the chancellor is clearly against the weight of the evidence.
According to the testimony of appellee, W. H. Laney, one of the appellants, induced him to purchase the stock in the Booneville bank upon the false representation that said bank was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hunt v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Myers v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Bell v. FrittsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Joyce v. McCordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Stroud v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ham v. HartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- Vanderboom v. SextonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1969
- Held v. MansurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- City National Bank v. SternbergSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Receivables Purchasing Co. v. Engineering & Professional Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.