Legal Opinion

Ham v. Hart

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1954No. 5758PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUJAN, Justice.

During the summer of 1949 the defendant (appellee) had a water well drilled on the premises referred to in the complaint. She used water therefrom by means of a pump operated by electric current until November of that year when the electricity was turned off and never used again for approximately four years, or, until it was sold to plaintiff in 1953. A log was furnished defendant by the well driller in 1949 which indicated that it was 150 feet deep and would produce two gallons of water per minute at that time.

The plaintiff (appellant) instituted this action to recover damages…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. ScribnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Trust Co. v. FletcherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
  3. Rosenberg v. CyrowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Jones v. FriedmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Thrams v. BlockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ledbetter v. WebbNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Halpert v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  3. Prudential Insurance Company of America v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Maxey v. QuintanaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Modisette v. Foundation Reserve Insurance Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API