Legal Opinion
Vanderboom v. Sexton
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided January 24, 1969No. FS-68-C-47PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN E. MILLER, Senior District Judge.
The questions before the court arise on the motions of the defendants for summary judgment.
On December 16, 1968, the defendant Sam Sexton, Jr., filed his motion for summary judgment in accordance with the provisions of Rule 56(b), (c), Fed. R.Civ.P., on the ground that “the complaint, answer of this defendant, and affidavit of this defendant attached hereto and marked Exhibit A, show that the defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
On December 20, 1968, the defendants Austin Gatlin, Erma S. Gatlin and Diamond G Ranch, Inc., filed…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Cope v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Vanderboom v. SextonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Batchelor v. Legg & Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1971
- Ilo Vanderboom, Investors Thrift Corporation v. Sam Sexton, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Vanderboom v. SextonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- INVESTORS THRIFT CORPORATION v. SextonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.