Legal Opinion

City National Bank v. Sternberg

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 31, 1938No. 4-4916PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMebiabby, J.

The McKinney Bayou Drainage District was organized in 1923 and issued $446,000 in 5y2 per cent, bonds. I. H. Nakdimen was the president and active manager of the City National Bank of Fort Smith, Arkansas.

It is undisputed that in July, 1929, appellee was in the City National Bank and that I. H. Nakdimen said he was on a trade for some bonds. About six weeks after that time the appellee bought twenty-three $1,000 bonds at 95 cents on the dollar.

Appellee testified that when Nakdimen spoke to him about the bonds he.called appellee’s attention to the fact that appellee owned some Fayetteville…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Kirby v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Prevost v. GratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  4. Veazie v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  5. Meader v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Brewer v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  3. Hughes v. McCannCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Vanderboom v. SextonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1969
  5. Yudin v. CarrollDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API