Legal Opinion

Jardanowski v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 8, 2000No. 1 CA-IC 98-0170, 1 CA-IC 99-0011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge.

¶ 1 This is a consolidated statutory special action review of two Industrial Commission of Arizona (ICA) awards and decisions upon review involving common legal issues. In both claims, the administrative law judges applied Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (A.R.S.) § 23-1028(A) to forfeit petitioners’ entitlement to all workers’ compensation disability, medical, and other benefits based upon convictions for theft under A.R.S. § 13-1802(A)(3) (Supp. 1998) for having knowingly made false representations' to obtain temporary partial disability compensation. Because we conclude that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Obregon v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Wright v. Uniforms for IndustryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Wolford v. Pinnacol AssuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API