Legal Opinion

Wolford v. Pinnacol Assurance

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 2004No. 01CA2415PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge WEBB.

Plaintiff, Charlene Wolford, appeals the summary judgment granted in favor of defendant, Pinnacol Assurance, upholding the forfeiture of permanent partial disability (PPD) benefits previously awarded to her for industrial injuries. She challenges the forfeiture on statutory construction grounds, as a violation of double jeopardy principles, as an excessive fine, and as untimely. We affirm.

Plaintiff sustained physical and emotional industrial injuries when she was assaulted at work. She collected temporary total disability (TTD) benefits of $16,698.63, and was awarded both…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Colorado Water Conservation BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Deutschendorf v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Support, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. In Re CardwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  5. People v. ShepardColorado Court of Appeals · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wolford v. Pinnacol AssuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. Associated Business Products v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API