Legal Opinion

Obregon v. Industrial Commission of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 28, 2008No. 1 CA-IC 07-0020PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 In this special action review of an Industrial Commission of Arizona (“ICA”) decision upon review for a forfeiture of all workers’ compensation benefits, we must determine the proper interpretation of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 23-1028(A) (Supp.2006). Petitioner Employee Alfonso L. Obregon (“Claimant”) was convicted of violating § 23-1028 by making false statements to obtain temporary partial disability benefits. The question is whether the forfeiture imposed by § 23-1028(A) applies to all workers’ compensation benefits or only those benefits…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Department of Revenue of Ore. v. ACF Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Colorado Common Cause v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. Maycock v. Asilomar Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. Pinal Vista Properties, L.L.C. v. TurnbullCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Karen Fann v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Harris Corp. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. Johnson v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. State of Arizona v. Aaron Raymond FikesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. Midtown Medical Group, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API