Obregon v. Industrial Commission of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEMMILL, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 In this special action review of an Industrial Commission of Arizona (“ICA”) decision upon review for a forfeiture of all workers’ compensation benefits, we must determine the proper interpretation of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 23-1028(A) (Supp.2006). Petitioner Employee Alfonso L. Obregon (“Claimant”) was convicted of violating § 23-1028 by making false statements to obtain temporary partial disability benefits. The question is whether the forfeiture imposed by § 23-1028(A) applies to all workers’ compensation benefits or only those benefits…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Department of Revenue of Ore. v. ACF Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Colorado Common Cause v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Maycock v. Asilomar Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Pinal Vista Properties, L.L.C. v. TurnbullCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Karen Fann v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- Harris Corp. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Johnson v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State of Arizona v. Aaron Raymond FikesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Midtown Medical Group, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.