In Re Dominique
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEBTORS’ MOTION TO DETERMINE POST-PETITION ESCROW INCREASES DISCHARGEABLE
LAUREL M. ISICOFF, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter came before the Court on February 1, 2007, and then again on April 5, 2007, on the Debtors’ Motion to Determine Post Petition Escrow Increases Dis-chargeable (CP # 63). I have considered the Motion, and the memoranda of law filed by the Debtors and Countrywide (CP ## 73 and 76, respectively), the argument of counsel, as well as applicable law, and for the reasons set forth below grant in part and deny in part the Motion because…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Eugene Telfair v. First Union Mortgage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- IN Re: Carmen Bateman, Debtor, --- Universal American Mortgage Company v. Carmen BatemanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- In Re PerezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. Hoggle (In re Hoggle)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Padilla v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (In Re Padilla)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Payne v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (In Re Payne)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Miller v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. (In Re Laskowski)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008
- In Re JohnsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- In re TavaresUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.