Nobelman v. American Savings Bank
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas
This case focuses on the interplay between two provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. The question is whether § 1322(b)(2) prohibits a Chapter 13 debtor from relying on § 506(a) to reduce an undersecured homestead mortgage to *326the fair market value of the mortgaged residence. We conclude that it does and therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
I
In 1984, respondent American Savings Bank loaned petitioners Leonard and Harriet Nobelman $68,250 for the purchase of their principal residence, a condominium in Dallas, Texas. In exchange, petitioners executed an adjustable rate note payable…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Barnhill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by876 opinions
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Ryan v. Homecomings Financial NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Birmingham v. PNC Bank, N.A. (In Re Birmingham)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Lockhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
871 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.