Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Johnson

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 9, 2008No. 19-42431PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION SUSTAINING DEBTOR’S AMENDED OBJECTION TO WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK’S PROOF OF CLAIM

PHILLIP J. SHEFFERLY, Bankruptcy Judge.

I

Introduction

This opinion addresses an objection to a proof of claim filed by a mortgage creditor in a Chapter 13 case. The dispute before the Court centers on the application of § 2609(b) of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), 12 U.S.C. § 2609(b), to the arrearage portion of the proof of claim. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(a) and 157(a). This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B). For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Raleigh v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Taylor v. Brighton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  4. State of Louisiana v. Litton Mortgage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. In Re HughesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Padilla v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (In Re Padilla)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Payne v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (In Re Payne)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2008
  3. Au v. Republic State Mortgage Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
  4. In re TavaresUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
  5. In re MicekUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API