Legal Opinion

Walker v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 31, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

These are four actions of tort; one by Robert E. Walker to recover for personal injuries and property damage as the result of a collision between an automobile, owned and driven by him, and an electric car of the defendant, and for medical and nursing expenses incurred in consequence of the injuries to himself, his wife and two minor children who were riding with him and.suffered the injuries for which the other three actions were brought. It was agreed that there could be no recovery by any of the occupants unless Robert E. Walker was entitled to recover. He will be referred to as the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jeddrey v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Barnett v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. BabbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Stickel v. CassasaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Newton v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Finn v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API