Spirlong v. Browne
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORRIS, Judge:
¶ 1 Under state statutes, a person “keeping” a dog for more than six consecutive days is considered the dog’s owner and is strictly liable for any injuries and damages caused by the dog. The issue in this appeal is whether “keeping” requires the person to have exercised care, custody, or control of the dog. We hold it does.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶2 In August 2007, Defendant/Appellee Charles Browne rented two rooms in his home to David Mayes and his wife. Mayes owned two dogs, including a Belgian Malinois named Joop. Mayes brought both dogs with him when he and his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Pawlowski v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Trager v. ThorMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Industrial Commission v. Old Republic InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Apache Junction v. DoolittleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Goldberger v. State FarmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019