Legal Opinion

City of Apache Junction v. Doolittle

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 17, 2015No. 1 CA-CV 13-0744PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORRIS, Judge:

¶ 1 In May 1999, the Legislature repealed the statute that enabled municipalities to use tax increment financing (“TIF”) to finance redevelopment projects. The issue in this appeal is whether Defendant/Appellee Pinal County Treasurer Delores Doolittle is required to distribute TIF revenues to Plaintiffs/Appellants, the Cities of Apache Junction and Casa Grande, because, before the effective date of the repeal, the Cities adopted redevelopment plans that allowed them to use TIF. We hold the County Treasurer is not required to make those distributions and, therefore, affirm…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In Re Dos Cabezas Power DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Steinfeld v. NielsenArizona Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Revenue v. Capitol Castings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michael K. Reilly and Sierra Pipeline, LLC v. Philip L. Canale and Terra CanaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API