Koury v. Follo
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.
For the purposes of an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit, the plaintiff’s evidence must be considered by us in the light most favorable to him and he must be given the benefit of every favorable inference which can reasonably be drawn there from. Strong, N. C. Index, Trial, § 21. Discrepancies, if any, in the plaintiff’s evidence must be disregarded. He must be given the full benefit of all relevant evidence introduced, even though improperly admitted over objection seasonably entered. Supply Co. v. Ice Cream Co., 232 N.C. 684, 61 S.E. 2d 895; Ballard v. Ballard, 230 N.C. 629, 55 S.E. 2d 316;…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Ballard v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Braswell v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Wall v. StoutSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Purcell v. ZimbelmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Thompson v. CarterMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.