Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Zimbelman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 20, 1972No. 2 CA-CIV 1130PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge.

This was an action for negligence against a hospital and several doctors. Prior to submission to the jury, all doctors were dismissed from the action except Dr. Purcell.

The jury returned a $150,000 verdict against both the hospital and Dr. Purcell. In this appeal the hospital presents the following questions:

“1. In order to prove a prima facie case, must the plaintiff prove that defendant’s alleged negligence caused injury to the plaintiff? Specifically, in this case, was the plaintiff required to prove that the hospital’s alleged negligence in failing to restrict or supervise…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Fiorentino v. WengerNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Kavanagh v. ButoracIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  4. E. L. Jones Construction Co. v. NolandArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. McDowell v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Nason HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Pedroza v. BryantWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Johnson v. Misericordia Community HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API