Legal Opinion

Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. Yelverton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 1923PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The first fifteen exceptions relate to the admission or rejection of evidence and require no special discussion. the evidence excepted to was competent as tending to show sucb knowledge by the plaintiff of the defendant’s equities as amounted to bad faitb in taking the note, or fraud in procuring its execution, or some incidental circumstance in corroboration of other testimony; and the excluded evidence wbicb is the subject of exceptions 10, 11, and 11% was not in any view competent against the defendant.

Equally untenable are the defendant’s several exceptions to the issues wbicb were…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cooper v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Whitehurst v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Brewer v. RingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Jarrett v. High Point Trunk & Bag Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Pretzfelder v. Merchants Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Williams v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Ward v. . HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Ward v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Roberson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Pierce v. American Fidelity Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API