Legal Opinion
George Foreman Associates, Ltd. v. Foreman
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 25, 1974No. Civ. A. C-73-1483 RFP, C-73-1230 RFPPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PECKHAM, District Judge.
These two related cases arise out of a series of contracts entered into by George Foreman, the recognized world heavyweight boxing champion; Charles R. “Dick” Sadler, his manager and trainer; Martin Erlichman; and George Foreman Associates, Ltd. (Associates), a partnership. In No. C-73-1230 RFP, plaintiffs Foreman and Sadler seek relief from the most recent of these contracts, and have moved for summary judgment on the grounds that the most recent contract is illegal under California law and therefore void and unenforceable ; defendant Associates, by way of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Alexander v. AngelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- De La Beckwith v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Hudson v. CraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Scolavino v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Castillo v. BarreraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- George Foreman and Charles R. Sadler, and v. George Foreman Associates, Ltd., and George Foreman Associates, Ltd., and v. George Foreman, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Dow Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Airs International, Inc. v. Perfect Scents Distributions, Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Schwartz v. EliadesNevada Supreme Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.